The increased limits agreed in 2015 between the contracting parties to the 1996 protocol, enters into force in Hong Kong on 4 December 2017
The increased limits agreed in 2015 between the contracting parties to the 1996 protocol, enters into force in Hong Kong on 4 December 2017
Published 08 November 2017
Our earlier Gard Insight discussed the implementation of the 1996 Protocol to the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 (the 1996 Protocol) which came into effect in Hong Kong on 3 May 2015. In April 2012 the Member States to the 1996 Protocol agreed an increase of approximately 51 per cent in tonnage limits in their jurisdictions with effect from 8 June 2015 to reflect the changes of monetary values over the period and to cope with inflation. These new limits of liability will now come into operation in Hong Kong on 4 December 2017. The summary of the amendments can be found on the IMO website.
The tables below set out a comparison between the limits under the 1976 Convention, the 1996 Protocol and the revised 1996 Protocol for personal injury/loss of life claims, property claims and passenger claims in Hong Kong. The amendments will apply to maritime claims that arise after 4 December 2017. The limits are based on the gross tonnage of the vessel and are expressed in Special Drawing Rights (SDR) as published by the IMF. The current exchange rate of the SDR is SDR 1 = USD 1.40.
Gross Tonnage
LLMC 1976 limits
pre 3 May 2015
1996 Protocol limits
in force from 3 May 2015
Revised 1996 Protocol limits in force from 4 December 2017
<500
SDR 167,000
SDR 1,000,000
SDR 1,510,000
501 – 2,000
SDR 167 per ton
SDR 1,000,000
SDR 1,510,000
2,001 – 30,000
SDR 167 per ton
SDR 400 per ton
+ SDR 604 per ton
30,001 – 70,000
SDR 125 per ton
SDR 300 per ton
+ SDR 453 per ton
70,000
SDR 83 per ton
SDR 200 per ton
+ SDR 302 per ton
Gross Tonnage
LLMC 1976 limits
pre 3 May 2015
1996 Protocol limits
in force from 3 May 2015
Revised 1996 Protocol limits in force from 4 December 2017
<500
SDR 333,000
SDR 2,000,000
SDR 3,020,000
501 – 2,000
SDR 500 per ton
SDR 2,000,000
SDR 3,0200,000
2,001 – 30,000
SDR 333 per ton
SDR 800 per ton
+ SDR 1,208 per ton
30,001 – 70,000
SDR 250 per ton
SDR 600 per ton
+ SDR 906 per ton
70,000
SDR 167 per ton
SDR 400 per ton
+ SDR 604 per ton
LLMC 1976 limits
pre 3 May 2015
1996 Protocol limits
in force from 3 May 2015
Revised 1996 Protocol limits in force from 4 December 2017
SDR 46,666 multiplied by the number of passengers which the ship is certificated to carry for each passenger
SDR 175,000 multiplied by the number of passengers which the ship is certificated to carry for each passenger
Up to SDR 25,000,000
No limit
To illustrate more clearly the effect of the increase we set out below some examples of limits converted into US dollars, using the current exchange rate..
Gross Tonnage
LLMC 1976 limits
pre 3 May 2015
1996 Protocol limits
in force from 3 May 2015
Revised 1996 Protocol limits in force from 4 December 2017
Handysize ship 25,000
USD 5,961,900
USD 14,280,000
USD 21,562,800
Panamax ship 40,000
USD 8,880,900
USD 21,280,000
USD 32,132,800
Capesize ship 85,000
USD 15,873,900
USD 38,080,000
USD 57,500,800
5,000 TEU containership 55,000
USD11,505,900
USD 27,580,000
USD 41,645,800
VLCC 160,000
USD 24,588,900
USD 59,080,000
USD 89.210,800
Gross Tonnage
LLMC 1976 limits
pre 3 May 2015
1996 Protocol limits
in force from 3 May 2015
Handysize ship 25,000
USD 1,247,260
USD 28,560,000
USD 37,329,600
Panamax ship 40,000
USD 18,303,600
USD 42,560,000
USD 57,209,600
Capesize ship 85,000
USD 32,310,600
USD 76,160,000
USD 107,945,600
5,000 TEU containership 55,000
USD 23,553,600
USD 55,160,000
USD 76,235,600
VLCC 160,000
USD 49,845,600
USD 118,160,000
USD 171,365,600
Gross Tonnage
LLMC 1976 limits
pre 3 May 2015
1996 Protocol limits
in force from 3 May 2015
Quantum of the Seas, 4,905 passengers
USD 320,455.422 but not exceeding USD 35,000,000
USD 1,201,725,000
The limits adopted in Hong Kong are now in line with the other contracting parties to the revised 1996 Protocol.
The increase in liability limits may result in “forum shopping” in large causualties. That is owenrs seeking to establish a limitation fund in jurisdictions that apply lower limits, for example, Singapore and mainland China. Conversely, claimants will likely seek jurisdiction for claims in Hong Kong.
The increase in limitation does not affect the P&I cover for claims covered under the terms of the P&I insurance policy.